The Historical Evolution of Allostery: From a Population-Based Account to a Single-Molecule Account and Back Again

This abstract has open access
Abstract Summary

Allostery describes the process whereby ligand binding at one site on a protein transmits an effect to another distal site. Ever since its discovery in 1961, allostery has remained an important topic within structural biology because of its role in cell regulation. However, the concept has changed drastically since Jacques Monod and his colleagues first characterized it. This paper aims to recount the conceptual evolution of allostery over the past 50 years. I argue that the concept has evolved in three stages. First, from the late 1950s to the  mid-1960s, allostery was a population-level phenomenon, closely tied to biochemistry and heterodox enzyme kinetics. Then, starting in the mid-1960s and extending to the mid-2000s, allostery became a feature of individual protein molecules with special structural and conformational properties. The final stage in this conceptual evolution, which introduced the ‘ensemble nature of allostery’, began in the mid-2000s (Motlagh et al. 2014). Creager and Gaudilliere (1996) have offered an explanation for the first historical transition based on the complex interplay between theory and experiment, and it is the primary aim of this paper to characterize the second transition and offer an explanation for it. I aim to show that the driving forces behind the conceptual shift from the structural-mechanistic view to the ensemble view were twofold: (1) the mounting body of anomalies that could not be explained by any of the structural-mechanistic models of allostery and (2) the increasing recognition that protein dynamics play an important role in protein structure and function.

Abstract ID :
HSS25282
Submission Type
Abstract Topics
Temporal Keywords :
Contemporary
Keywords :
Allostery, Conceptual Evolution, Anomalies, Jacques Monod
University of Pittsburgh, History & Philosophy of Science Dept.

Abstracts With Same Type

Abstract ID
Abstract Title
Abstract Topic
Submission Type
Primary Author
HSS80709
Natural Philosophy
Individual Paper
Isaac Newton
HSS12185
Environmental Sciences
Individual Paper
Brian Tyrrell
HSS61317
Human and Social Sciences
Individual Paper
Dr. Bridgette Robinson
HSS90262
Physical Sciences
Individual Paper
Ms. Anna Amramina
HSS40232
Historiography
Individual Paper
Dr. Edward Gosselin
HSS40189
Human and Social Sciences
Individual Paper
Ohad Reiss Sorokin