Environmental Sciences Ravenna A, Third Floor Organized Session
01 Nov 2018 03:00 PM - 05:00 PM(America/Vancouver)
20181101T1500 20181101T1700 America/Vancouver Climate Cartography from Maps to Models

This session explores the history of attempts to visualize climate as a spatial phenomenon and the use of maps as historical records of climate change. The focus is on the early nineteenth to the mid twentieth century in central Europe, colonial Africa, and the United States, important contexts for the development of both mapmaking techniques and ecological frameworks of inquiry. Climate maps played key roles in the emerging disciplines of atmospheric physics, geology, geomorphology, ecology, evolutionary biology, and human biogeography. Simultaneously, they figured in debates for or against schemes of conquest, colonization, and development. Although they have drawn little attention from historians, maps of climate and related phenomena merit analysis from multiple angles. As Mott Greene’s paper illustrates, they are rich sources for the history of climate science, revealing the instability of the very concept of climate. Climate maps are also unique windows onto the historical relationship between science and empire-building, as Deborah Coen’s and Philipp Lehmann’s papers suggest. A third approach, exemplified by David Spanagel’s paper, is to explore the uses to which such maps have been put. A single map can be read in quite different ways at different points in time, of which the present search for traces of anthropogenic climate change is just one in a long series of reframings. In sum, this session aims to draw attention to maps as sources for the history of climatology and allied sciences and to expand the range of historical questions that we bring to them.

Organized by Deborah Coen (Yale University)

Ravenna A, Third Floor History of Science Society 2018 meeting@hssonline.org
52 attendees saved this session

This session explores the history of attempts to visualize climate as a spatial phenomenon and the use of maps as historical records of climate change. The focus is on the early nineteenth to the mid twentieth century in central Europe, colonial Africa, and the United States, important contexts for the development of both mapmaking techniques and ecological frameworks of inquiry. Climate maps played key roles in the emerging disciplines of atmospheric physics, geology, geomorphology, ecology, evolutionary biology, and human biogeography. Simultaneously, they figured in debates for or against schemes of conquest, colonization, and development. Although they have drawn little attention from historians, maps of climate and related phenomena merit analysis from multiple angles. As Mott Greene’s paper illustrates, they are rich sources for the history of climate science, revealing the instability of the very concept of climate. Climate maps are also unique windows onto the historical relationship between science and empire-building, as Deborah Coen’s and Philipp Lehmann’s papers suggest. A third approach, exemplified by David Spanagel’s paper, is to explore the uses to which such maps have been put. A single map can be read in quite different ways at different points in time, of which the present search for traces of anthropogenic climate change is just one in a long series of reframings. In sum, this session aims to draw attention to maps as sources for the history of climatology and allied sciences and to expand the range of historical questions that we bring to them.

Organized by Deborah Coen (Yale University)

The Origins of Modern Climatology in Wladimir Köppen's 1901 Climate Classification and MapView Abstract
Part of Organized SessionEnvironmental Sciences 03:00 PM - 03:30 PM (America/Vancouver) 2018/11/01 22:00:00 UTC - 2018/11/01 22:30:00 UTC
Periodization in the history of science is governed by the appearance of certain texts: Newton (1687), Lavoisier (1789), Lyell (1833), Darwin (1859), Einstein (1905), Watson and Crick (1953). Knowing the names and dates, we can call off the titles of these works, all seen to initiate a new phase in the life of a given science. These foundational classics are seen to be built upon, but not overthrown. In climatology, such a foundational work is Köppen (1901):  Versuch einer Klassification der Klimate, by Wladimir Köppen (1846-1940).
This text and its accompanying map defined what we mean by climate today-- suites of animals and plants living at different latitudes, in regions whose character is defined by mean temperature and precipitation. The system of climate zonation Köppen presented in 1901, and his scheme for mapping it, is still in use everywhere.  Temperature and precipitation provide the threshold boundaries for suites of animals and plants that we now call indicator species; the shift in thermal and precipitation regimes at given latitudes, and the changing animal and plant communities at these same latitudes, constitutes what we mean by "climate change.” The “Köppen zones” and their associated species at the beginning of the 20th century function, to a very great extent, as the baseline climate for the modern world. Given scientific interest in climate change today, Köppen’s 1901 monograph has every right to be considered one of the most important scientific works of the last century.
Presenters Mott Greene
University Of Washington
Seeing Climate in MotionView Abstract
Part of Organized SessionEnvironmental Sciences 03:30 PM - 04:00 PM (America/Vancouver) 2018/11/01 22:30:00 UTC - 2018/11/01 23:00:00 UTC
By 1900, a wide range of schemes for mapping climate had emerged in Europe. What most of them had in common was the absence of weather. They represented climate as a static variable, a long-term average, in which phenomena on the time scale of weather—clouds, storms, and gales—were invisible. How could the dynamic nature of climate be made manifest? This presentation will explore the first maps that captured climate dynamics. Produced in Vienna in the 1880s, they were part of a broader burgeoning of thematic cartography in the multinational Habsburg Empire. The revolutions of 1848-9 impressed on Habsburg statesmen the political significance of modern nationalism, and they responded with a new ideology of supranationalism. Geography was one among several disciplines that aimed to survey the vaunted multiplicity of the Habsburg lands and to present its findings to the public, in the form of maps, atlases, panoramas, and museum displays. The simultaneously technical and political challenge of representing the natural and cultural diversity of this territory gave rise to a range of novel techniques, shaping disciplines from ethnography to climatology. Climate maps in the late Habsburg Empire represented climate as a phenomenon of circulation—a motor of unity in diversity—and highlighted its significance for human life.
Presenters
DC
Deborah Coen
Yale University
Harold N. Fisk's (1944) Maps of the Meandering Mississippi RiverView Abstract
Part of Organized SessionEnvironmental Sciences 04:00 PM - 04:30 PM (America/Vancouver) 2018/11/01 23:00:00 UTC - 2018/11/01 23:30:00 UTC
In the spring of 1941, the United States Army Corps of Engineers authorized an ambitious geological investigation of the alluvial valley of lower Mississippi. This project would occupy the Mississippi River Commission for the next three and a half years, and its final report would showcase the remarkable analytic and cartographic talents of Louisiana State University geology professor Harold Norman Fisk (1908-1964). This paper traces the impact of Fisk’s meander maps on a wide array of scientific and cultural domains. Beyond geology and engineering, where Fisk’s achievement was widely recognized, I examine how these maps have stimulated other scientific, humanistic, and cultural interpretations of the Mississippi River’s past. Archaeologists, for example, used Fisk’s periodization of the river’s various channel stages as a key technical tool for identifying the most likely locations where Amerindian and European artifacts might link to historical events. Now we come full circle, from historical applications, to esthetics, and back to science. Geomorphologists have long assumed that the sedimentary legacies of environmental change are indistinguishable from those from tectonic influences. In the context of recent attention to anthropogenic climate change, however, Fisk’s maps provide an exquisite basis for closer study of climate factors in river system dynamism.
Presenters David Spanagel
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Yale University
University of Washington
York University
University of Sydney/Harvard University
Upcoming Sessions
206 visits